As I started to put together the elements of my I found myself a bit anxious at the thought of this process. As with anything new I attempted in this class I had a bit of trepidation. I can't explain it. The map is there and accessible through so many APA tools so it isn't like I had to reinvent the wheel. Never the less I put my mind to it and started to work. As I began to put my sources on paper and organize them and then create the summary of what the document was about and why it applied to my topic, the big picture opened up in front of me. Where I initially thought this was such a waste of time, created to ensue that I was really finding sources and using them to create an original work, I realized how this process helped me to see where each article fit into my topic and the flow of my future paper. The annotated bibliography helps me to map out when and where I can apply that information as I draft up my paper. I could see the outline of my research paper developing right before my eyes.
Once I had the format down and got into the swing of it the paper flowed easily and was soon complete. Learning how to properly cite different types of documents was by far the hardest part.
Over the last few weeks as I was researching for the assignments I found and saved some related items that didn't necessary fit in with what we had to turn in but addressed my topic. Once item was an NPR radio program which really provided me with an "AH HA" moment. It is not social media that causes aggressive behavior in our youth but is actually a vehicle for them to share what they have been doing. Where they would normally share their actions face to face with friends, they can now share them, often as they are occurring, through video and photos, with their circle and beyond. With so many people having profiles on social media the potential for sharing is huge. There are also so many different platforms that are available that it makes monitoring these activities very difficult.
Now I do not fear the tool, I embrace it. Knowledge truly is power.
My submission:
How can society
reduce the use of social media to perpetuate physical aggression between young
people?
This presentation
as part of the UIAA Life long learning series provided some very interesting
statistics on the percentages of people that have profiles on social media and
how much time is spent on these sites.
Based on a 2012 survey by Pew Research Center 94% of teens have a
facebook profile and only 25% of them have it set to private. That is a very large number of teen
users. It also provided usage
statistics for other sites such as twitter, Instagram, Vine, Snapchat, Kik
Messenger, ask.fm, Tinder, Whisper and Shots. What is alarming is that the minimum age of most of these
sites is 13 to 17, but there is really no way to validate the age. It is very easy to enter a fake
birthday to create a profile. All
of these social media sites allow for picture/video sharing and communication
and many allow for anonymity of the poster with no monitoring of activity by
the app host. Snapchat allows
anyone 13 or older to join and has a system which allows the member to send
self destructing test, photos and videos.
All of these are tools which allow socializing and networking. According to the presentation 19% of those
using these platforms were bullied through them. Even more alarming is that 88% witnessed cruel behavior on
these sites and 21% of those joined in.
All of these platforms are potential tools for encouraging and
presenting aggressive behaviors.
What is concerning is that there are so many
open with little
or no control to who joins, that monitoring and prevention is nearly
impossible. How then are we able
to prevent such behaviors.
Carrington evaluates the increase in female violence and
how it is impacted by a shift in social norms and feminist theories. She considers whether females have
actually become more violent or rather their behaviors have become more
noticeable. Throughout the ages,
women fell into certain social roles and were expected to exhibit certain
behaviors. As society changes so
do the roles that women play in it.
Women are now more active in behaviors normally reserved for young men
such as “acting tough, excessive smoking, swearing, fighting, drinking, being
disruptive at school, being rude to teachers, and being open about sex” (p.
5). Further more these activities
are being showcased in movies, television shows and video games, which makes
the behaviors seem part of the norm.
Social media, while most often used by girls to develop and
maintain positive relationships, is also used to document and share their
fights. A review of the statistics
shows that this activity seems to be higher among girls than boys. The videos seem to be created and
shared in order to obtain bragging rights by the girls involved. There are social media/websites that
actually encourage such fights by seeing ratings by viewers. Obviously the highest rated video would
bring additional popularity to those involved.
How society views these behaviors and responds to it being
showcased on social media could have an impact on reducing these
activities. If social media sites
were held accountable or punished for allowing such videos to be published or
law enforcement was given more leeway in using the videos as evidence to press
charges against the perpetrators, perhaps there would be a reduction in such
behaviors.
Martin,
M. (Host). (2013, January
15). Does Social Media Encourage
Violent Teen Behavior [Radio
broadcast
episode]. http://www.npr.org/2013/01/15/169421562/what-causes-violent-teen-behavior
This interview addresses the correlation between social
media and aggressive behavior in teens.
The question is asked, “Does social media encourage violent teen
behavior.” The over all response
of the panel was no, it does not.
What social media does is allow a venue for teens to publicize and share
their activities. Where they may
have bragged about it in person to their friends, now they can record the
actions in real time and share it instantly gaining immediate feedback, not
only from their social circle, but from their peers world wide. The panel discusses that it is a
parental responsibility to not only monitor what teens are doing on line but to
teach them what is acceptable behavior.
One panelist stated that teens are selfish and often only care about
what they want at a particular time and place and do not give consideration to
how their behaviors impact others.
With our young people growing up in such a digital age, it is critical
that we teach them right and wrong and guide them in the positive use of such
things as social media and discourage behaviors that can not only bring harm to
themselves but to others.
Patton,
D. U., Hong, J. S., Ranney, M., Patel, S., Kelley, C., Eschmann, R., &
Washington, T. (2014). Social
media as a
vector for youth violence: A review of the literature. Computers In Human
Behavior, 548.
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.043.
This journal article reviews the existing literature
addressing youth violence and the relationship to social media. It recognizes that the “empirical data
describing this relationship is limited” p. 549, but it does exist. The authors reviewed 56 articles addressing
topics on peer violence, which included cyber-bullying. The conclusion was that “electronic
youth violence” (p. 552) appears to be on the rise and it is in need of more
attention. There appears to be a
weak definition of what cyber bullying actually is and it certainly requires
some further attention. The
challenge for researchers is not only the weak definitions but how one goes
about evaluating such behaviors in an ever changing, growing electronic world. Every day more and more websites and
apps are created widening the platform for such behaviors to occur.
In regards to the question, of society reducing the violent
behaviors via social media, it is clear that more research and evaluation needs
to occur to facilitate such actions.
One must understand the challenge to effectively make a positive impact
on it.
Sontag, L. M., Clemans, K. H.,
Graber, J. A. and Lyndon, S. T. (2011). Traditional and Cyber Aggressors
and Victims: A
Comparison of Psychosocial Characteristics.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
40(4),
392-404. DOI 10.1007/s10964-010-9575-9
This study was a
comparison of traditional and cyber aggressors to understand the relationship
between the psychological traits and behaviors for both the aggressors and the
victims. Certain traits are “critical
factors” (p. 393) in traditional aggressive behaviors. Identifying these tendencies early
could predict the potential for future negative behaviors allowing for both an
effort towards behavior modification of the child and/or stricter control of
their access to potential victims.
Society as a whole should be concerned with the aggressive behaviors
both online and in cyber space but more focus should be placed at the lowest
levels. Parents, teachers, and
others who have contact with children early on should be educated and aware of
these traits/characteristics to enable early intervention and potential
redirection of negative behaviors to a more positive and productive
outlet.
Walrave, M. (2012). E-youth : Balancing Between Opportunities
and Risks. Bruxelles:
P.I.E. Peter Lang.
This book
evaluates the positive and negative aspects of the increasing use of Internet
technologies by today’s youth. The
availability of Internet technology opens up a huge world to young people today
with array of opportunities to learn, grow, and develop relationships and
social networks. While these young
people are growing up technically savvy, they may not be getting adequate
supervision or skills to protect themselves from the dangers that they bring
right into their own homes. There
is also a divide between what adults see as a risk and what children do. As our children grow we teach them not
to talk to strangers but the line between a new friend and a stranger appears
to have been blurred with the introduction of social media. Young people tend to use social media
to make friends and create a peer network. Unfortunately this seemingly innocent act can morph into acts
of cyber bullying and even physical aggression. How parents monitor and the level to which they control
Internet activity appears to vary based on culture but the consensus seems to
be “that it is the task of policy makers to promote parental mediation of
Internet use” (p. 248). In
order to prevent the increase of aggression via social media we must be aware
of what children are doing when they are plugged in. Prevention starts at home by teaching responsible behaviors
and attitudes in the digital world.